Ruto’s Rebranding of Uhuru Projects: The Kenyan Political Project Makeover
By THE DISPATCH DIGITAL REPORTER
In recent weeks, President William Ruto has embarked on what is increasingly being referred to as the “Great Kenyan Project Makeover,” a initiative aimed at rebranding and reviving infrastructure projects originally conceived and launched by his predecessor, former President Uhuru Kenyatta. While the official narrative presents this as a necessary step to complete and breathe new life into stalled projects, the move has stirred significant public debate, with opinions split between those who see it as a shrewd political strategy to take credit for his predecessor’s work and those who view it as a genuine effort to advance the country’s development.
President William Ruto assumed office in September 2022, inheriting a host of ongoing infrastructure projects from the previous administration. These projects, part of Kenyatta’s “Big Four Agenda,” included initiatives in sectors such as transport, energy, and housing, aimed at transforming Kenya’s socio-economic landscape. However, due to various challenges—including financial constraints, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic—many of these projects had either stalled or fallen behind schedule by the time Ruto took office.
Apparently in recognition of both the political and economic significance of these projects, President Ruto made it a priority to appear o be completing them. However, rather than merely continuing them under their original branding, Ruto chose a different approach: to relaunch and rebrand these initiatives as part of his administration’s vision for Kenya’s future. This strategy, while not unprecedented in the world of politics, has sparked considerable discussion and scrutiny.
The Rebranding Ruse: Political Strategy or Genuine Revival?
At the heart of this initiative is the question of intent. Critics argue that the rebranding effort is primarily a political maneuver designed to allow Ruto to take credit for projects that were not originally his. They liken it to redecorating a room and then claiming it as a brand-new space—essentially, a case of repackaging old goods in new wrapping.
For instance, the Standard Gauge Railway (SGR) extension, a flagship project of the Kenyatta administration, has been relaunched under Ruto’s government with promises of enhanced features and expanded reach. Similarly, housing projects under Kenyatta’s affordable housing agenda have been rebranded and relaunched with new names and fresh promises of delivery. In each case, the administration has framed these rebrands as necessary steps to “complete and optimize” the projects, while detractors view it as a convenient way to sidestep the issue of continuity and instead create the illusion of newness.
Supporters of the President, however, argue that the rebranding is not only justified but necessary. They contend that many of these projects had been languishing due to lack of funding, mismanagement, or other issues, and that Ruto’s involvement has been crucial in reviving them. By relaunching the projects under his administration’s banner, they argue, Ruto is signaling a fresh start and a renewed commitment to ensuring their completion.
The Economic Angle: Addressing Stalled Projects and Pending Bills
Beyond the political optics, there is a significant economic dimension to Ruto’s rebranding initiative. Many of the projects that have been relaunched were stalled due to financial issues, particularly the accumulation of pending bills owed to contractors and suppliers. These unpaid debts have not only slowed the progress of the projects but have also had wider repercussions for the economy, affecting businesses and leading to job losses in the construction sector.
By relaunching these projects, Ruto’s administration is also attempting to address these financial challenges. In many cases, the relaunches have been accompanied by the release of funds to clear pending bills, allowing work to resume. This move has been welcomed by contractors and other stakeholders, who see it as a positive step toward getting the projects back on track and injecting much-needed liquidity into the economy.
However, questions remain about the sustainability of this approach. While the relaunches have provided a temporary boost, there are concerns about whether the government will be able to maintain the momentum needed to see these projects through to completion. The Kenyan government is grappling with significant budgetary pressures, and it remains to be seen whether sufficient funds can be allocated to ensure that all of these projects are completed within the promised timelines.
Public Reaction: A Divided Opinion
The rebranding initiative has not gone unnoticed by the Kenyan public, who have taken to social media and other platforms to voice their opinions. As is often the case in Kenya’s vibrant political landscape, reactions have been mixed.
On one hand, there are those who view the relaunches as little more than a political stunt, designed to allow Ruto to take credit for work that was already underway. These critics point out that many of the projects being relaunched are well-known to the public, having been widely publicized during Kenyatta’s presidency. To them, the rebranding effort is a transparent attempt to rewrite history and claim achievements that rightly belong to the previous administration.
On the other hand, there are those who see the relaunches as a necessary and pragmatic step. They argue that, regardless of who originally initiated the projects, the most important thing is that they are completed and delivered to the Kenyan people. From this perspective, Ruto’s rebranding initiative is seen as a positive move that ensures continuity and avoids the waste of resources that would result from abandoning partially completed projects.
The Broader Implications: Political Strategy and the Road to 2027
Looking beyond the immediate impact, Ruto’s rebranding initiative can also be seen as part of a broader political strategy aimed at securing his position ahead of the next general election in 2027. By rebranding and relaunching these projects, Ruto is not only creating a narrative of action and progress but also positioning himself as the leader who can get things done.
This strategy is particularly important in the context of Kenya’s competitive political environment, where the ability to deliver tangible results can be a decisive factor in securing electoral support. By ensuring that these projects are associated with his administration, Ruto is effectively laying the groundwork for his re-election campaign, presenting himself as the leader who can bring development and prosperity to the country.
At the same time, the rebranding effort also serves to neutralize potential criticism from his opponents, who might otherwise accuse him of failing to deliver on his promises. By taking ownership of these projects, Ruto can point to concrete achievements as evidence of his effectiveness, thereby strengthening his position and bolstering his chances of success in 2027.
In the final analysis, President Ruto’s “Great Kenyan Project Makeover” can be viewed through multiple lenses. For some, it is a masterclass in political optics, a savvy move designed to take credit for ongoing projects and ensure that Ruto remains in the spotlight. For others, it is a genuine effort to revive stalled projects and deliver on the promises of development made to the Kenyan people.
Excerpt:
Tags and Longtail Keywords:
